A/B testing (or split testing) is one of the most powerful tools in an analyst’s toolbox: it allows you to compare two (or more) versions of a web page, feature, or user experience — and determine which version truly performs better.

SQL is ideal for this kind of work: since A/B testing often involves user-level or event-level data stored in databases, writing SQL queries can help you assign variants, aggregate metrics, measure conversion rates, and produce summary tables for further statistical analysis or reporting.

In this article, we’ll walk you through a practical, step-by-step framework for running A/B tests using SQL — from experiment setup to result summarization. This guide is aimed at business analysts, BI engineers, data analysts, or anyone working in data-driven teams.

---

1. A/B Testing: Overview & Key Concepts

Before diving into SQL, let’s recap the fundamental ideas behind A/B testing.

What is A/B Testing?

• You randomly assign users (or sessions, or other units) into two or more variants — e.g., A (control) vs B (treatment).
• You define success metrics (conversion rate, click rate, purchase rate, average order value, retention, etc.) to measure performance.
• After the test period, you compare results between variants — often calculating conversion rates, lift (improvement), and statistical significance before making decisions.

Why Use SQL for A/B Testing?

• Your experiment data (users exposed, events triggered, timestamps, user-IDs) often lives in relational databases / data warehouses.
• SQL enables flexible grouping, filtering, and aggregations — perfect for building user-level or event-level summary tables.
• Once you derive summary metrics (via SQL), you can export results to tools like Excel, BI dashboards, or statistical environments for deeper analysis.

---

2. Step-by-Step: Running A/B Tests with SQL

Below is a walkthrough of how you might run an A/B test using SQL — from variant assignment to summary metrics.

Step 1: Assign Users to Variants

If you don’t already have experiment assignment data (control vs treatment), you can simulate random assignment inside SQL. For example:

-- Example: simple 50/50 split by user_id hash

SELECT
  user_id,
  CASE WHEN MOD(ABS(HASH(user_id)), 2) = 0 THEN 'A' ELSE 'B' END AS variant
FROM users;

This creates a table of users and their assigned variant. In real experiments, this assignment would ideally be done before user interactions — but for retrospective analyses you can still approximate with hashing (though it might bias results).

Once you have variant assignments, store them in a dedicated table, e.g., experiment_assignments.

Step 2: Combine Assignments with Event Data

Assuming you log user events (page view, sign-up, purchase, click, etc.) in an events table, you can join them with the assignment table to see what happened in control vs treatment.

SELECT
  ea.variant,
  COUNT(DISTINCT ea.user_id) AS total_users,             -- number of users in variant
  COUNT(e.user_id) AS conversions,                       -- e.g. purchases or desired action
  COUNT(e.user_id) * 1.0 / COUNT(DISTINCT ea.user_id) AS conversion_rate
FROM experiment_assignments ea
LEFT JOIN events e
  ON ea.user_id = e.user_id
  AND e.event_type = 'purchase'       -- or whatever your target event is
GROUP BY ea.variant;

This yields a simple summary:

variant	total_users	conversions	conversion_rate
A	1,200	150	0.125
B	1,180	170	0.144

This is the core result: you see how many users converted (or performed the target action) under each variant — and what fraction that is.

Step 3: Build a User-Level Summary Table

It’s best practice to build a persistent user-level table for your experiment. This table should list each user exposed to the test, their variant, and any relevant aggregated metrics (orders, purchases, revenue, sessions, etc.). Medium+1

Example structure:

| user_id | variant | total_sessions | total_purchases | total_revenue | converted_flag | … |

This table becomes a stable “source of truth” for further analysis, cohort breakdowns, segmentation, and reporting.

Pros of a user-level table:

• Easy recalculation of metrics
• Simple slicing & dicing (by country, time, user cohort)
• Consistent inputs for statistical significance checks or further deep dives

Important tips:

• For users with zero events (no purchase, no session), make sure metrics are explicitly set to 0, not NULL. Otherwise, aggregations (averages, denominators) may be misleading.
• Exclude users you don’t want (spam, bots, overlapping exposures, etc.) from the table.

Step 4: Aggregate Summary Metrics by Variant (Cohort-Level)

From the user-level table, you can compute overall metrics by variant. For example:

SELECT
  variant,
  COUNT(*) AS total_users,
  SUM(total_purchases) AS total_purchases,
  SUM(total_revenue) AS total_revenue,
  AVG(total_purchases) AS avg_purchases_per_user,
  SUM(total_revenue) / SUM(total_purchases) AS avg_order_value,
  SUM(CASE WHEN total_purchases > 0 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) * 1.0 / COUNT(*) AS conversion_rate
FROM experiments.user_summary
GROUP BY variant;

This gives you a comprehensive view: adoption, conversion, revenue, order value — whichever KPIs you care about.

Once you have these numbers, you can compare performance between variants, compute lift (e.g. how many % increase relative to control), and feed the results to dashboards, reports, or statistical testing tools.

Step 5: (Optional) Quick Statistical Significance Check in SQL — or Export

SQL is limited for rigorous statistical testing (t-tests, p-values, confidence intervals), but you can run basic approximations (e.g. standard error) or export your summary table to Python/R/Excel for deeper statistics.

-- Example: compute standard error for conversion rate across user-level data
WITH conv AS (
  SELECT
    variant,
    CASE WHEN total_purchases > 0 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END AS converted_flag
  FROM experiments.user_summary
)
SELECT
  variant,
  AVG(converted_flag) AS conv_rate,
  STDDEV_POP(converted_flag) / SQRT(COUNT(*)) AS std_error
FROM conv
GROUP BY variant;

For full statistical testing (t-test, chi-square, confidence intervals) — export these numbers to your favorite stats environment.

---

3. Best Practices & Pitfalls for Analysts

From experience and common pitfalls, here are some practical recommendations when using SQL for A/B analysis:

Recommendation / Pitfall	Advice
Ensure random assignment or proper recording of variants	Use known assignment tables or robust randomization logic; avoid bias.
Build a clean user-level summary table	Don’t rely on raw event logs for final analysis. Use 0 (not NULL) for zero events.
Define success / guardrail metrics clearly upfront	Eg. conversion rate, average order value, retention rate, etc.
Avoid mixing metrics with different denominators	Don’t average order values via AVG(order_value) — aggregate totals properly (e.g. total revenue ÷ total orders).
Check data integrity and filter out anomalies	Exclude bots, test users, multiple exposures, spam — includes only valid users.
Use persistent tables, not ephemeral queries	Make your experiment reproducible. Keep snapshot of raw & user-level data.
Export summary for statistical testing if needed	SQL isn’t ideal for significance tests; use Python/R/Excel for p-values & confidence intervals.
Track multiple metrics (primary + guardrails)	E.g. if you test a UI change for conversions, ensure you don’t accidentally increase bounce rate or reduce retention.

---

4. A/B Testing Workflow: From Hypothesis to Decision

Here’s a typical A/B workflow using SQL:

1. Define hypothesis & metrics (success + guardrail)
2. Assign users / sessions to variants (random or flagged)
3. Collect event data during test period
4. Build user-level summary table
5. Aggregate metrics by variant (cohort-level table)
6. Export results & run statistical significance (optional)
7. Produce visualizations / reports / dashboards
8. Interpret & make decision (roll out change, iterate, or abandon)

---

5. Example SQL Code — Full Minimal Template

Here’s a minimal end-to-end SQL template to implement A/B test analysis. You can copy & adapt for your project.

-- 1. Assign variants (if not pre-assigned)
CREATE TABLE experiment_assignments AS
SELECT
  user_id,
  CASE WHEN MOD(ABS(HASH(user_id)), 2) = 0 THEN 'A' ELSE 'B' END AS variant
FROM users;

-- 2. Build user-level summary
CREATE TABLE experiment_user_summary AS
SELECT
  ea.user_id,
  ea.variant,
  COUNT(DISTINCT s.session_id) AS total_sessions,
  COALESCE(SUM(CASE WHEN e.event_type = 'purchase' THEN 1 ELSE 0 END), 0) AS total_purchases,
  COALESCE(SUM(CASE WHEN e.event_type = 'purchase' THEN e.revenue ELSE 0 END), 0) AS total_revenue,
  CASE WHEN SUM(CASE WHEN e.event_type = 'purchase' THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) > 0 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END AS converted_flag
FROM experiment_assignments ea
LEFT JOIN sessions s
  ON ea.user_id = s.user_id
LEFT JOIN events e
  ON ea.user_id = e.user_id
  AND e.event_time BETWEEN '2025-11-01' AND '2025-11-15'  -- experiment window
GROUP BY ea.user_id, ea.variant;

-- 3. Aggregate cohort-level metrics
SELECT
  variant,
  COUNT(*) AS users,
  SUM(total_purchases) AS purchases,
  SUM(total_revenue) AS revenue,
  AVG(converted_flag) AS conversion_rate,
  AVG(total_purchases) AS avg_purchases_per_user,
  SAFE_DIVIDE(SUM(total_revenue), NULLIF(SUM(total_purchases),0)) AS avg_order_value
FROM experiment_user_summary
GROUP BY variant;

You can then export the result for further analysis or visualization.

---

6. When NOT to Use SQL for A/B Testing Alone

• When you need robust statistical significance testing (t-tests, confidence intervals, Bayesian analysis) — SQL lacks built-in support. Use Python, R, or a BI tool with statistical extensions.
• For complex user journeys or multi-touch attribution — where users may see multiple variants or events — handling via SQL gets tricky. Better to combine logging data with specialized analytics or experimentation platforms.
• For real-time bandit algorithms or dynamic assignments — SQL static assignments don’t support adaptive logic; you need specialized tools or scripts.

---

Conclusion

A/B testing using SQL is powerful, flexible, and often enough for many analytics needs. With a solid data model, careful user-level aggregations, and clear metric definitions, you can derive meaningful insights and support data-driven decisions — all without leaving your warehouse or database.

But also remember its limitations: for rigorous statistical validation, complex user flows, or dynamic experiments, you may need additional tools.

If you follow the steps above — assignment → user summary → cohort metrics → export → significance testing — you’ll have a clean, reproducible, and transparent A/B testing workflow built entirely with SQL.